Testseek.co.uk have collected 96 expert reviews of the Apple iPod Nano 7G 8GB / 16GB MD480/MKN52 and the average rating is 77%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Apple iPod Nano 7G 8GB / 16GB MD480/MKN52.
September 2015
(77%)
96 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
77010096
The editors liked
Plays video in widescreen
Small
Colours will appeal to some
The Apple iPod Nano has a sleek aluminum design
FM radio
Bluetooth and long battery life
Bluetooth
Multi
Touch
Nike
Fitness built
In
FM Radio built
Choice of colours
Apple can never seem to make its mind up when it comes to the iPad nano. First it was long
Then it was fat
Then it was long again
Then square
And now once again
It’s long. It was a smart choice though
The 5.4mm thin aluminium frame is as sturdy as it is beautiful.It’s an iPod nano
It’s an Apple device
You don’t need us to tell you by this point that it’s easy to use. Still
We’re happy to
Very compact
Nicely made case feels quality in the hand
Headphones much improved over previous Apple buds (new “Earpods” are quite good) though not as good as some stand alone sets
Screen is a fairly respectable 2.5″ 432×240 pixel display quite sharp a
Good capacity
Great design
Sounds ace
FM radio is brilliant
Nike+ sync
Lovely screen
Impeccable sound quality
Battery life
Intuitive and lovely to use
Sleek and attractive design
Clear and colourful picture
Sound quality is a step above previous generation
Very thin and light
Yet sturdy
Large
Nicely responsive touchscreen
Excellent battery life
Supports wireless Bluetooth streaming
Slim body
Responsive touchscreen
Easy to use interface
2.5in screen
Improved headphones
The editors didn't like
No clip for sportswear attachment
Last year's iPod touch is available for £20 more
With no Wi-Fi
You're stuck syncing music via USB from a PC or Mac running iTunes. It doesn't work with Apple Music subscriptions
And the low-res screen is tiny
No camera
No 3rd party apps
No clip
Old
Style earphones
Yes
The new iPod nano certainly is pretty. But it’s an iPod nano that plays video and connects to iTunes to sync all your media. In other words
It’s the same as it was in 2007. Minus the clickwheel. It’d be tempting to pass it off as “don’t fix what ain’t broke”
But this is Apple
And we’re not giving it a pass. Why not fix it? Wi-Fi for one
Wouldn’t go amiss
For iTunes streaming or even - g
Radio function is a bit crude
Lacking presets and no auto search (also requires the headphones to be plugged in) It does have a live pause function though (which is unusual and useful)
Wifi would be handy (maybe the next version)
Have to use iTunes t
Will scratch
Fairly expensive
No equaliser
Small screen isn't ideal for watching videos
Finger-marks on screen
Still no video recording
No inline playback controls
A bit expensive
Fairly low screen res
Limited features
New charge/sync port won't fit existing iPod docks
Slim body, Responsive touchscreen, Easy to use interface
A bit expensive, Fairly low screen res, Limited features
The 2012 iPod nano 7th generation doesn't have the chops to make the same impact as a new iPod touch or iPhone 5. Its screen isn't great in some respects, it's a bit expensive and it doesn't do all that much. However, it's so much of a joy to use on a day...
Like millions of other people I now use my smartphone as my primary portable media player, and this redesign isn’t going to reverse that trend. Even so, this is still a pretty smart update, and the Bluetooth capability and slimline design of the new N...
Apple can never seem to make its mind up when it comes to the iPad nano. First it was long, then it was fat, then it was long again, then square, and now once again, it’s long. It was a smart choice though: the 5.4mm thin aluminium frame is as sturdy as it is beautiful.It’s an iPod nano, it’s an Apple device: you don’t need us to tell you by this point that it’s easy to use. Still, we’re happy to
Yes, the new iPod nano certainly is pretty. But it’s an iPod nano that plays video and connects to iTunes to sync all your media. In other words, it’s the same as it was in 2007. Minus the clickwheel. It’d be tempting to pass it off as “don’t fix what ain’t broke”, but this is Apple, and we’re not giving it a pass. Why not fix it? Wi-Fi for one, wouldn’t go amiss, for iTunes streaming or even - g
There’s no doubt that this iPod nano is the best one Apple’s created - and its existence next to the iPod shuffle is once again justified. But now that it resembles the iPhone more than ever, it raises the question: why doesn’t it do more? For work out...
Very thin and light, yet sturdy, Large, nicely responsive touchscreen, Excellent battery life, Supports wireless Bluetooth streaming
Still no video recording, No inline playback controls
At £129, the iPod Nano is still £40 less expensive than the £169 base model iPod Touch, which is also a year old; the new iPod Touch Apple introduced with this iPod Nano now starts at £249 for 32GB. This pricing scheme makes the iPod Nano an ideal choic...
Plays video in widescreen; small; colours will appeal to some
No clip for sportswear attachment; last year's iPod touch is available for £20 more
To be honest, we're simply glad to see the nano get back on track after the somewhat baffling experiment with the 2010 model. It's still a bit pricey, and we reckon Apple really needs a model that hits the £99.99 mark, but the larger screen and super-slim...
Abstract: The iPod Classic is a terrific portable media player. It may be the last of its kind from Apple. In fact, the iPod Classic may be the end of the line for the iPod as we know it.It seems remarkable that the iPod, a device just the size of a pack of cigar...
Published: 2018-04-04, Author: Jeremy , review by: ilounge.com
A return to the tall and thin form factor that was most popular in past iPod nanos, including eight different color options, the first 2.5” screen on an iPod nano, and a touchscreen interface. The first nano to include Bluetooth, with excellent wireless r
Despite small resolution improvements, screen quality is mediocre by comparison with other screened iPods and iPhones, and multitouch functionality is extremely limited. Apart from Bluetooth support, most features were executed just as well if not better
The Apple iPod Nano has a sleek aluminum design, FM radio, Bluetooth and long battery life
With no Wi-Fi, you're stuck syncing music via USB from a PC or Mac running iTunes. It doesn't work with Apple Music subscriptions, and the low-res screen is tiny
The iPod Nano is an aging music player that's hurt by its outdated reliance on iTunes and lack of subscription music compatibility...
