Testseek.co.uk have collected 96 expert reviews of the Apple iPod Nano 7G 8GB / 16GB MD480/MKN52 and the average rating is 77%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Apple iPod Nano 7G 8GB / 16GB MD480/MKN52.
September 2015
(77%)
96 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
77010096
The editors liked
Plays video in widescreen
Small
Colours will appeal to some
The Apple iPod Nano has a sleek aluminum design
FM radio
Bluetooth and long battery life
Bluetooth
Multi
Touch
Nike
Fitness built
In
FM Radio built
Choice of colours
Apple can never seem to make its mind up when it comes to the iPad nano. First it was long
Then it was fat
Then it was long again
Then square
And now once again
It’s long. It was a smart choice though
The 5.4mm thin aluminium frame is as sturdy as it is beautiful.It’s an iPod nano
It’s an Apple device
You don’t need us to tell you by this point that it’s easy to use. Still
We’re happy to
Very compact
Nicely made case feels quality in the hand
Headphones much improved over previous Apple buds (new “Earpods” are quite good) though not as good as some stand alone sets
Screen is a fairly respectable 2.5″ 432×240 pixel display quite sharp a
Good capacity
Great design
Sounds ace
FM radio is brilliant
Nike+ sync
Lovely screen
Impeccable sound quality
Battery life
Intuitive and lovely to use
Sleek and attractive design
Clear and colourful picture
Sound quality is a step above previous generation
Very thin and light
Yet sturdy
Large
Nicely responsive touchscreen
Excellent battery life
Supports wireless Bluetooth streaming
Slim body
Responsive touchscreen
Easy to use interface
2.5in screen
Improved headphones
The editors didn't like
No clip for sportswear attachment
Last year's iPod touch is available for £20 more
With no Wi-Fi
You're stuck syncing music via USB from a PC or Mac running iTunes. It doesn't work with Apple Music subscriptions
And the low-res screen is tiny
No camera
No 3rd party apps
No clip
Old
Style earphones
Yes
The new iPod nano certainly is pretty. But it’s an iPod nano that plays video and connects to iTunes to sync all your media. In other words
It’s the same as it was in 2007. Minus the clickwheel. It’d be tempting to pass it off as “don’t fix what ain’t broke”
But this is Apple
And we’re not giving it a pass. Why not fix it? Wi-Fi for one
Wouldn’t go amiss
For iTunes streaming or even - g
Radio function is a bit crude
Lacking presets and no auto search (also requires the headphones to be plugged in) It does have a live pause function though (which is unusual and useful)
Wifi would be handy (maybe the next version)
Have to use iTunes t
Will scratch
Fairly expensive
No equaliser
Small screen isn't ideal for watching videos
Finger-marks on screen
Still no video recording
No inline playback controls
A bit expensive
Fairly low screen res
Limited features
New charge/sync port won't fit existing iPod docks
Very thin and light, yet sturdy. Larger, more responsive touch screen than before. Bundled EarPods are much improved. Finally supports wireless stereo Bluetooth streaming. Includes a pedometer and Fitness app. Stellar battery life.
Still no video recording. No in-line playback controls. Not natively compatible with existing accessories, thanks to the new Lightning Connector
Apple puts the iPod nano back on track with its latest version, which sports a sweet new design, a larger touch screen, video playback capabilities, and more....
Published: 2012-10-09, Author: Donald , review by: cnet.com
The Apple iPod Nano has a sleek aluminum design, FM radio, Bluetooth and long battery life
With no Wi-Fi, you're stuck syncing music via USB from a PC or Mac running iTunes. It doesn't work with Apple Music subscriptions, and the low-res screen is tiny
The seventh-generation iPod Nano is an incredibly compact portable media player with gym-friendly features, but it's overshadowed by the superior value of Apple's iPod Shuffle and fourth-generation iPod Touch.
Published: 2012-10-09, Author: Luigi , review by: i4u.com
Abstract: Japanese blog Macotakara not only published a iPod touch 5th Generation review , but also already was able to tes the new iPod nano that is supposed to ship later this month. The new iPod nano is a drastically different product than its predecessor. The n...
Was this review helpful?
-
Published: 2011-11-10, Author: James , review by: gadgetreview.com
Larger icons are easier to see, Watch feature is an interesting turn for many users, Everything good about it last year is still there
No hardware upgrades from last year. No AM/HD radio, no internal antenna, no earbuds with a microphone, Watch faces are limited; no option to download/make/buy different ones, Still very easy to lose. No solution for keeping it safely in sight except by w
There are a lot of things I'd have liked to see improved on the Nano, but it's still by far the bes...
The Apple iPod Nano has a sleek aluminum design, FM radio, Bluetooth and long battery life
With no Wi-Fi, you're stuck syncing music via USB from a PC or Mac running iTunes. It doesn't work with Apple Music subscriptions, and the low-res screen is tiny
The iPod Nano is an aging music player that's hurt by its outdated reliance on iTunes and lack of subscription music compatibility...
Thinner than the previous nano, Built in Bluetooth, pedometer, Lightning, Larger multitouch display
We'll soon find out
Apple's refresh of the iPod nano brings a larger, longer screen, a revamped iOS-esque interface, and some integrated features that should cement the nano's position as the media player of choice for fitness junkies, gadget lovers and budget-minded buyers...
Bluetooth, Multitouch, NikeFitness builtin, FM Radio builtin, Choice of colours
No camera, No 3rd party apps, No clip, Oldstyle earphones
An improvement on last year's iPod nano, mainly thanks to the inclusion of video playback. We found the general design and shape more pleasing too, and we can live without the clip that the last generation had – the nano is so lightweight that slipping i...
