Testseek.co.uk have collected 59 expert reviews of the Motorola Razr 40 and the average rating is 82%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Motorola Razr 40.
July 2023
(82%)
59 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
82010059
The editors liked
Great-looking phone that feels good in the hand
Big
Bright and colour-rich display
Smooth and responsive performance
Decent battery life
Clean software
Almost affordable for a foldable phone
Long battery life
Motorola's software has some neat tricks
The editors didn't like
Cameras are mid-range
Mid-range chipset isn't as fast/efficient as Snapdragon 8 series
Great-looking phone that feels good in the hand,Big, bright and colour-rich display,Smooth and responsive performance,Decent battery life,Clean software
Cameras are mid-range,Mid-range chipset isn't as fast/efficient as Snapdragon 8 series,Questions over flexible display durability remain
Almost affordable for a foldable phone,Long battery life,Motorola's software has some neat tricks
Mostly useless outer display,Creaky build feels cheap,Performance is nothing special for the price
A mid-range foldable phone is a great idea but the Motorola Razr 40 makes a few too many sacrifices to make it a viable alternative to some of the pricier, far better competitors. The battery life is great though. PROS Almost affordable for a foldable ph...
Exquisite Flip design with grippy vegan leather exterior, Great primary display with a rather unobtrusive crease, Helpful external OLED, Adequate battery life, fast charging, Loud stereo speakers, good audio quality, Great sustained performance, no thrott
Basic ingress protection, We never saw 144Hz refresh rate on the screen unless forced, GPU performance is behind direct competitors, Electronic stabilization needs improvement
The competitionThe Motorola Razr 40 turned out to be an excellent little smartphone with premium design and cool form factor, flagship-grade display, very capable cameras, loud stereo speakers and solid battery life. Its external display turned out to be...
relatively cheap for a flip smartphone, high quality case, eSIM enabled, stock Android with 4 years of updates, fast, stable WiFi, fit for global use, accurate tracking capabilities, bright screen with DC dimming, wireless charging
USB 2.0 port only, significant heating under load, including performance throttling
In review: Motorola Razr 40. Test device provided by Motorola Germany.Motorola makes cuts to the Razr 40 in some painful, but ultimately right areas in order to be able to offer a relatively cheap flip and foldable smartphone. US$755 is certainly still a...
When I finished the script for this review video, I realized that the Razr 40 Standard isn't as bad as I thought it would be. It's on par with the Ultra version in terms of photography, hinge, internal screen, charging, and design. Even if you spend the e...
Published: 2023-08-28, Author: Alex , review by: ausdroid.net
Abstract: Foldables are becoming more and more popular, and I'll be honest when I say I am still a bit sceptical of them purely because it's the longevity of the display that concerns me.Don't get me wrong, I like foldables and flip phones as I know they are the...
Published: 2023-08-02, Author: Chris , review by: gadgetguy.com.au
Attractive and portable design, 33W charger included, Beautifully vibrant main display
The cover screen's small size diminishes its usefulness, Cameras that slightly over-process images, Not as powerful as other flip phones
At $999, the Motorola Razr 40 is Australia's most affordable foldable flip phone. It makes some sacrifices along the way but makes up for it with a great display and convenient form factor...
The 1.5" external screen is surprisingly useful with its swipe widgets, Good battery life and a 1-hour charge, Smooth, almost visibly imperceptible crease on an excellent best screen, A point-and-shoot camera is fine for most users, Excellent 2+3+4 warran
Not for gamers and power users (although it has a powerful SoC it throttles, and a Flip screen is too soft for prolonged use), USB-C 2.0 means no USB-C to HDMI audio/video streaming, No micro-SD (no flagship has this anyway), but it has mountable, slow, e
Rendimiento muy bueno para tener un Snapdragon 7 Gen 1,Diseño refinado y exterior antideslizante,Incluye carcasa protectora,Cargador en la caja,Android stock, sin apenas personalización,3 actualizaciones de Android aseguradas y parches de seguridad durant
Pantalla exterior insuficiente para la generación actual de plegables tipo concha,Autonomía muy justa,Cámaras y procesado de imagen por software mediocres,Esperábamos un hardware mejor
Apenas se nota el pliegue en la pantalla con el teléfono desplegado (ni al tacto, ni a la vista), La capa de personalización de Motorola sigue siendo un acierto, Sin ser barato, es el plegable más económico y que abre la puerta a que esta tecnología se de
Se calienta con relativa facilidad a causa de su material de cuero vegano, La autonomía sigue siendo bastante justa y su carga rápida pierde atractivo con "sólo" 30 W, Aunque se entiende como un sacrificio necesario, se echa en falta una mayor pantalla ex
