uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Phones » Mobile phones » Motorola Moto E



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Motorola Moto E

Testseek.co.uk have collected 295 expert reviews of the Motorola Moto E and the average rating is 76%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Motorola Moto E.
Award: Most Awarded May 2014
May 2014
 
(76%)
295 Reviews
Users
(80%)
197 Reviews
76 0 100 295

The editors liked

  • Low price
  • Nice build
  • Decent screen and power
  • Design and manufacturing quality worthy of a bigname smartphone
  • OS is fluid
  • Responsive
  • Fair screen
  • Gorilla Glass 3
  • Great price
  • Pure Android
  • Sturdy build quality
  • The new Motorola Moto E is proof that a cheap phone can be good
  • Too
  • You're getting reasonable performance
  • A sharp display and LTE connectivity for $150
  • Unlocked
  • The Moto E is cheap
  • Comes with the latest Android KitKat software and has a screen and processor capable of tackling the essentials
  • Beautiful design
  • MicroSD card slot
  • User friendly
  • Cheap
  • MicroSD storage (but limited to 32GB)
  • Reliable performance
  • Compact
  • Sturdy build
  • Good design and excellent build quality. Bright
  • Good quality screen. Unmodified Android
  • Plus futureproof for at least one major upgrade
  • Stock Android
  • Great build quality
  • Expandable storage
  • Android 5.0 Lollipop
  • Affordable
  • Reasonable performance
  • Decent design
  • Great design
  • Affordable price
  • Good display
  • Excellent battery life
  • MicroSD support
  • Raw Android 4.4 operating system
  • Great sound
  • It took a few years
  • But Motorola has finally left its “edgy” Batman-esque designs and needless Kevlar coating behind. It was needlessly macho
  • And more than a bit ugly. Like the Moto G and Moto X before it however
  • The Moto E is a handsome phone
  • If nothing more
  • With smooth lines and an uncluttered front face
  • With a colourful 4.3-inch screen (bigger than an iPhone’s). It’s reminiscent of Palm’
  • Un-skinned Android 4.4.2 Kitkat
  • Sturdy design
  • Good battery life
  • Great value
  • Class-leading screen
  • Up-to-date software
  • It costs $130
  • Comes with Android 4.4 KitKat
  • Comfortable to hold
  • Great battery life
  • Decent-sounding speakers
  • Moto Alert is useful
  • MicroSD slot included for expanded storage
  • Larger screen
  • Better battery life
  • 4G
  • Expandable memory
  • Budget price
  • That price! At £89
  • No other phone comes close to matching the specs offered here
  • Android 4.4 KitKat out of the box
  • The best screen resolution in its class
  • Very robust build
  • Android 4.4

The editors didn't like

  • No flash or front camera
  • Non
  • Removable battery
  • Terrible internal storage
  • Battery life
  • Camera
  • Horrible sound quality
  • Heavy body
  • No front camera
  • Charger not included(!)
  • Iffy camera
  • Not made for games
  • No 4G
  • Like its predecessor
  • Camera quality disappoints. The processor also occasionally struggles to keep up with more hardware-intensive tasks
  • Like gaming
  • Its camera and battery life don't impress and it isn't much less than the Moto G
  • Which remains the best Android bargain around
  • Underwhelming camera
  • Lower powered than we'd like
  • Disappointing main camera
  • Screen's great but not HD
  • Tiny internal storage. Occasionally feels a little slow. No 4G. Average rear camera and no frontfacer
  • Poor camera
  • Low-spec CPU
  • Low internal storage
  • Camera is average
  • Only 8GB of storage
  • No front-facing camera
  • Terrible rear camera
  • Slow performance/loading at times
  • Limited internal storage
  • No 4G connectivity
  • Motorola’s had to keep the Moto E lean to keep the price down
  • And that means a few compromises
  • Though they’re not also surprises. For starters
  • There’s only 4GB of storage on board
  • Leaving a pretty measly amount of space for apps after the Android OS install - it’s not a huge problem since you can store apps on your SD card
  • But you may find yourself moving apps over in the settings more than
  • Screen is lacking compared to the Moto G
  • Performance can stutter
  • Limited storage
  • Low-end CPU
  • No 4G LTE
  • 4GB of internal storage is not enough
  • Crappy rear cam
  • No front cam
  • Screen has poor viewing angles
  • Battery cover rattles
  • No NFC
  • Low memory storage
  • Camera is not great
  • Poor 5MP rearfacing camera and no frontfacing selfie snapper
  • Very little storage
  • 1.2GHz CPU struggles with some tasks
  • Average screen

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 2 of 30
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2014-08-30, Author: Dave , review by: wired.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Kids don't tend to buy their own phones, or if they do they apply for a loan from the bank of Mum&Dad. So kids phones shouldn't cost a fortune, but they should be able to perform all the functions that they need. Here are a few to think about.For an out...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2014-08-29, review by: mobilechoiceuk.com

  • Good design and excellent build quality. Bright, good quality screen. Unmodified Android, plus futureproof for at least one major upgrade
  • Tiny internal storage. Occasionally feels a little slow. No 4G. Average rear camera and no frontfacer
  • Best in the sub-£100 class, the Moto E proves a smartphone can be both cheap and desirable. The E isn’t the thinnest and lightest; it doesn’t have the biggest screen, the most memory or the fastest processor. But it is incredibly affordable, has a good s...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2014-08-29, Author: TJ , review by: reviewed.com

  • Below average overall, but not bad for the money. We began this review by wondering what a phone designer would do if they had to make a good phone for under $130. It's hard to imagine a better response than the Moto E. It's a phone that, by necessity...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-08-13, Author: Marie , review by: techadvisor.co.uk

  • Abstract:  As the best budget smartphones in the Windows and Android camps, we compare the Motorola Moto E and Nokia Lumia 530 spec for spec to see whether your money is better spent with Microsoft or Motorola. Read our Nokia Lumia 530 vs Motorola Moto E comparison ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-07-21, Author: Britta , review by: pocket-lint.com

  • Great design, affordable price, good display, excellent battery life, microSD support, raw Android 4.4 operating system, great sound
  • No front-facing camera, terrible rear camera, slow performance/loading at times, limited internal storage, no 4G connectivity
  • The Moto E is a brilliant device for the price. If your budget doesn't stretch beyond £100 then we would say - ignoring the lack of 4G connectivity - that there isn't a competing device that offers the same overall experience, specification and desi...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2014-07-10, Author: Johann , review by: digitalversus.com

  • Design and manufacturing quality worthy of a bigname smartphone, OS is fluid, responsive, Fair screen, Gorilla Glass 3
  • Battery life, Camera, Horrible sound quality, Heavy body, No front camera, Charger not included(!)
  • With such serious multimedia and battery shortcomings, the Moto E is clearly no Rolls Royce of the phone industry. But it would be unfair to judge it based solely on that. After the Moto G's excellent value for money, Motorola is striking the same chord w...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(40%)
 
  Published: 2014-06-12, Author: Carly , review by: Theinquirer.net

  • Affordable, un-skinned Android 4.4.2 Kitkat, sturdy design, expandable storage, good battery life
  • Screen is lacking compared to the Moto G, performance can stutter

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2014-06-09, Author: Saqib , review by: whatmobile.net

  • That price! At £89, no other phone comes close to matching the specs offered here, Android 4.4 KitKat out of the box, The best screen resolution in its class
  • Poor 5MP rearfacing camera and no frontfacing selfie snapper, Very little storage, 1.2GHz CPU struggles with some tasks

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(85%)
 
  Published: 2014-06-05, Author: Sophie , review by: stuff.tv

  • Cheap, microSD storage (but limited to 32GB), Reliable performance, Compact, sturdy build
  • Disappointing main camera, Screen's great but not HD, No 4G, No front camera
  • Open Gallery If a £90 Nexus existed, it would look a lot like the Moto E. This isn't just Android for the masses, it's tidy, reliable, loveable Android for the masses. No, it isn't perfect. But considering we're yet to meet a mobile device that...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2014-06-02, Author: Matt , review by: techadvisor.co.uk

  • Abstract:  We compare the two best cheap phones you can buy. For full reviews see our articles: Motorola Moto E review: £89 budget smartphone sets new bar and Lumia 520 review: budget smartphone offers good features and build for less than £100 . Lumia 520 vs Moto ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 2 of 30 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 30   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×