uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Phones » Mobile phones » Samsung GT-S5690 Galaxy Xcover



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samsung GT-S5690 Galaxy Xcover

Testseek.co.uk have collected 60 expert reviews of the Samsung GT-S5690 Galaxy Xcover and the average rating is 67%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung GT-S5690 Galaxy Xcover.
 
(67%)
60 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
67 0 100 60

The editors liked

  • Looks nice
  • Rugged features
  • Well protected microSD card slot
  • Torch function
  • Gorilla Glass screen
  • Solid and rugged
  • Good chassis design
  • Rugged design
  • With IP67 rating
  • Attractive price
  • Has IP67 certification
  • So it is water and dustproof
  • Satisfactory hardware performance
  • Above average radio coverage

The editors didn't like

  • Low screen resolution
  • Some water seepage in our under the tap test
  • Poor camera
  • On the large side
  • No Flash support
  • General specifications lean solidly towards the midrange.
  • Lowresolution screen
  • Lowresolution camera
  • Short on internal storage
  • 800MHz CPU cannot handle Flash
  • Needs a price drop
  • Superior phones available for a similar price
  • Will never get an Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich update
  • The display is just downright bad
  • Camera won't replace a 5 year old digital camera.

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 6
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-11-13, Author: Sander , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • The Samsung Galaxy Xcover did not really manage to impress us. Granted, a rugged smartphone isn't judged by its performance, and the Xcover has been out for quite a while, but the performance is too mediocre to ignore it completely. The hands-on experie...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-04-10, Author: Blair , review by: kitguru.net

  • Has IP67 certification; so it is water and dustproof, Satisfactory hardware performance, Above average radio coverage
  • Needs a price drop, superior phones available for a similar price, Will never get an Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich update, The display is just downright bad, Camera won't replace a 5 year old digital camera.
  • Another fortnight, another farewell to another phone. Sometimes I wish the phone in my possession would somehow be forgotten by the respective PR firm but this was not really a vibe I got from the Samsung Galaxy xCover. I'm not saying it's a bad phone, it...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(65%)
 
  Published: 2012-03-22, review by: itreviews.com

  • Solid and rugged; good chassis design,
  • General specifications lean solidly towards the midrange.
  • The Samsung Galaxy Extreme looks great, and its rugged features will appeal to many; but look under the hood and you find it is not particularly well specified. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2012-02-13, Author: Sandra , review by: techradar.com

  • Looks nice, Rugged features, Well protected microSD card slot, Torch function, Gorilla Glass screen
  • Low screen resolution, Some water seepage in our under the tap test, Poor camera, On the large side, No Flash support
  • Samsung has made rugged handsets before, and not done too bad, but this is the first time the company has brought rugged features to an Android smartphone, and we aren't all that excited, because the general specifications are average rather than great. ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2012-02-03, review by: zdnet.co.uk

  • Rugged design, with IP67 rating, Gorilla Glass screen, Attractive price
  • Lowresolution screen, Lowresolution camera, Short on internal storage, 800MHz CPU cannot handle Flash

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(75%)
 
  Published: 2012-02-03, Author: Sandra , review by: zdnet.com

  • Rugged design, with IP67 rating, Gorilla Glass screen, Attractive price
  • Lowresolution screen, Lowresolution camera, Short on internal storage, 800MHz CPU cannot handle Flash
  • The Samsung Galaxy Extreme is an affordable Android handset whose rugged features may have some appeal, although we noticed a little water seepage under the backplate in our tests unless we were very careful about fitting it securely. It's short on intern...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(75%)
 
  Published: 2011-12-28, review by: phonearena.com

  • Resistance to dust, water, and shock, Solid feel, Easy to use with a single hand
  • Uglylooking display, Camera could be better
  • All in all, the Samsung Galaxy Xcover combines the functionality of an entry level Android-powered smartphone with the ability to withstand dust, shock, and water damage, which is a profile that few handsets can match. Our only major complaint is that...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2014-05-26, review by: avhub.com.au

  • Abstract:  We all love our smartphones — a computer in our pocket, keeping us connected and organised. The trouble is their fragility.Drop that shiny device, and it won't bounce. Or, likely, do much else until a repair bill is paid. So then, why don't they build the...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-02-13, review by: techradar.com/au/

  • Looks nice, Rugged features, Well protected microSD card slot, Torch function, Gorilla Glass screen
  • Low screen resolution, Some water seepage in our under the tap test, Poor camera, On the large side, No Flash support
  • The Samsung Galaxy Xcover is a rugged Android smartphone, and in that it has only two real competitors - the Motorola Defy and the newer Defy+, so the comparisons are inevitable. The build doesn't feel quite as solid as that of the Defy, and the general s...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2012-06-28, Author: Zara , review by: pcworld.co.nz

  • it's got some nice features, but there's not enough to make it stand out. It's not often that Samsung misses the mark, but the Xcover is a definite misstep. It's mostly a case of too little, too late for this rugged phone that doesn't stack up against i...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(40%)
    page 1 of 6 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×