uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Phones » Mobile phones » Samsung SM-A310 Galaxy A3 2016



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samsung SM-A310 Galaxy A3 2016

Testseek.co.uk have collected 133 expert reviews of the Samsung SM-A310 Galaxy A3 2016 and the average rating is 76%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung SM-A310 Galaxy A3 2016.
Award: Good Buy March 2016
March 2016
 
(76%)
133 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
76 0 100 133

The editors liked

  • Beautiful build
  • Good battery life
  • Decent screen

The editors didn't like

  • Average performance
  • Average camera
  • Somewhat pricier than some of its rivals

 

Reviews

page 2 of 14
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2016-03-29, Author: Chris , review by: recombu.com

  • Seriously good battery life, Comfortably small, Strong optics
  • Camera struggles in low light, No processor update
  • Samsung's Galaxy A3 2016 is essentially a mini Galaxy S6, boasting excellent battery life, strong optics and a great media experience, all wrapped up in a compact and gorgeous 4.7-inch package. If you want a mini mobile or simply can't afford Samsung's fu...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2016-03-05, Author: Andreas , review by: notebookcheck.net

  • very good casing quality, excellent screen, good telephony functionality, accurate touchscreen, low temperature development, micro-SD slot, NFC & USB-OTG, decent speaker, very long battery life
  • camera's low-light performance, no notification LED, no 5 GHz WiFi, no Miracast or MHL support, casing's slippery back, non-removable battery
  • Samsung's reiteration of the Galaxy A3 holds many advantages. One is the stiff casing's high-quality build that tactually convinces with rounded glass at the edges and a metal bezel. Drawbacks of this design are the non-removable battery and the slightly...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(85%)
 
  Published: 2016-02-04, review by: technave.com

  • Abstract:  Hey guys, you might have been busy preparing for Chinese New Year or a short getaway trip this coming weekend. But have you sought out your Valentines Day gift yet? No worries, we're here to help you out. Check out our picks for the top 7 pink smartphones...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-01-30, Author: Rory , review by: soyacincau.com

  • Samsung Galaxy A 2016 hands on and first impressionsPosted: January 30, 2016 By: Rory Lee 7 commentsWhen I found out that the new Galaxy A 2016 series from Samsung was going to borrow design cues from their Galaxy S flagship lineup, I was definitely intri...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-03-08, Author: Andreas , review by: notebookcheck.org

  • carcasa de buenísima calidad, pantalla excelente, buena funcionalidad de teléfono, pantalla táctil precisa, bajo desarrollo de temperatura, ranura micro-SD, NFC & USB-OTG, altavoz decente, larguísima duración de batería
  • rendimiento de cámara a baja, sin LED de notificación, sin WiFi 5 GHz, sin soporte Miracast o MHL, trasera resbaladiza, batería no extraíble

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(85%)
 
  Published: 2016-01-19, Author: Kike , review by: androidpit.es

  • Diseño, Duración de la batería, Ranura para microSD
  • Precio, Rendimiento, Cámara
  • He intentado odiar al A3 y no lo he conseguido. Su rendimiento no da para mucho pero tampoco es penoso, su camara es mala pero tampoco infernal, y su diseño es, sin duda, lo más sólido del terminal. Es un smartphone que entra por los ojos, y a la hora de...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2017-05-06, Author: Alex , review by: top-for-phone.fr

  • Vendus respectivement à leur sortie au prix de 309 Euros pour le A3 2016 et de 329 Euros pour le A3 2017, ces deux mobiles Samsung ont aujourd'hui bien baissé. Ainsi, il est désormais possible de se procurer un Galaxy A3 2016 à moins de 200 Euros et un A...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-08-21, Author: Alex , review by: top-for-phone.fr

  • un Samsung plus noble Lorsque l'on prend en main et que l'on soupèse les deux appareils, on a l'impression que le LG Xscreen fait « jouet ». En cause, un côté « tout plastique » qui, face au Samsung Galaxy A3 2016, ne fait pas très « quali ». Il n'y a ri...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-03-19, Author: Marco , review by: top-for-phone.fr

  • Ces 2 modèles sont très similaires, le contraire aurait pu être étonnant. En effet, à quelques détails près, ces mobiles apportent la même satisfaction d'utilisation. Les différences proviennent donc de la taille, et donc de la compacité de chaque modèle...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-03-18, Author: Marco , review by: top-for-phone.fr

  • le design étudié, la connectivité, la surcouche TouchWiz aboutie (depuis 2015)
  • les performances trop raisonnables (au regard du prix), Galerie photos, Autres, Voir la vidéo de déballage du Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
  • Si le A3 2016 est un beau mobile, doté d'un bel écran Super AMOLED 720p, ainsi que d'une belle connectivité, il faut reconnaître que les performances sont en deçà de ce que proposent certains concurrents pourtant vendus au même prix.Des concurrents qui po...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 2 of 14 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 14   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×