Testseek.co.uk have collected 112 expert reviews of the Samsung SM-J320 Galaxy J3 2016 and the average rating is 71%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung SM-J320 Galaxy J3 2016.
(71%)
112 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(74%)
96 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
710100112
The editors liked
Affordable
Similar dimensions to an S7
Color
Rich screen
The inexpensive Samsung Galaxy J3 runs the current version of Android and takes nice daylight photos. It has a long-lasting
Removable battery and the camera app launches with a double-click of the home button
Great screen
Low price
Decent performance
Neat S7-a-like design
Punchy screen
The editors didn't like
Annoying manual brightness
Not very powerful
Camera worse than best alternatives
Its underpowered processor makes the photo-capture slow enough to miss action shots
Published: 2017-05-25, Author: Alan , review by: alphr.com
The Samsung Galaxy J3 is a great budget smartphone. It's reasonably well made and has a great screen that leaves me wondering why more manufacturers don't specify AMOLED panels on their cheap handsets.The biggest problem the Galaxy J3 faces is the fact th...
The Samsung Galaxy J3 is certainly a respectable budget smartphone for £150, but with very little difference compared to the Galaxy J5 in terms of price - just £10 at the time of writing the review in 2016 - I can't think of any reason why you'd pick this...
The inexpensive Samsung Galaxy J3 runs the current version of Android and takes nice daylight photos. It has a long-lasting, removable battery and the camera app launches with a double-click of the home button
Its underpowered processor makes the photo-capture slow enough to miss action shots
Light users will do fine with Samsung's entry-level Galaxy J3, but you'll want a higher-powered phone if you plan to keep it around for two years or more...
Samsung Galaxy J3 – Camera There are many important areas in which the Samsung Galaxy J3 makes compromises compared to what you'll find elsewhere for the price. In terms of the camera, the J3 includes an 8-megapixel f/2.2 on the rear, where several phones...
Published: 2016-05-12, Author: Andrew , review by: techradar.com
Affordable, Similar dimensions to an S7, Color, rich screen
Annoying manual brightness, Not very powerful, Camera worse than best alternatives
With a bright screen and slim design the Samsung Galaxy J3 makes a good first impression, but annoyances like a lack of auto brightness hold it back from greatness...
The Samsung Galaxy J3 is certainly a respectable budget smartphone for £150, but with very little difference compared to the Galaxy J5 in terms of price - just £10 at the time of writing the review in 2016 - I can't think of any reason why you'd pick this...
The Samsung Galaxy J3 is a no-frills phone that will suit many users needs, but it's not quite cheap enough for our liking. At £150 it is underpowered and under-featured, though we like the microSD support and removable battery....
The Samsung Galaxy J3 is a good smartphone that will attract the attention of those who want the Samsung brand without a hefty price tag.Written by Michael Brown...
Was this review helpful?
(77%)
Published: 2016-04-18, Author: James , review by: 3g.co.uk
Great screen, Low price, Decent performance
Plastic build, Few standout features, Little built in storage
The Samsung Galaxy J3 lacks innovation but for the price bracket it's in it barely puts a foot wrong, delivering on almost all fronts...
Was this review helpful?
(80%)
Published: 2016-04-18, Author: James , review by: 3g.co.uk
Great screen, Low price, Decent performance
Plastic build, Few standout features, Little built in storage
The Samsung Galaxy J3 lacks innovation but for the price bracket it's in it barely puts a foot wrong, delivering on almost all fronts...
