Testseek.co.uk have collected 266 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
July 2015
(79%)
266 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(93%)
2719 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
790100266
The editors liked
Definite clock for clock improvement over Bulldozer
Increased clock speeds whilst keeping the same TDP
Competes against the Intel Core i5 3570K in lots of tasks
Good performance for the money
Good stable overclock
Great multi
Treaded performance
Good value for money
The editors didn't like
High power consumption is still an issue
Single threaded performance still needs improvement
Abstract: Earlier this month we looked at the gaming performance in Windows 8 compared to Windows 7 , and it turns out there was no difference. Afterwards our loyal readers asked us to apply our expertise to the processor performance in Windows 8, to find out whe...
Was this review helpful?
-
Published: 2012-11-08, Author: Dave , review by: techradar.com
Good stable overclock, Great multi, treaded performance, Good value for money
Definite clock for clock improvement over Bulldozer, Increased clock speeds whilst keeping the same TDP, Competes against the Intel Core i5 3570K in lots of tasks, Good performance for the money
High power consumption is still an issue, Single threaded performance still needs improvement, 32nm technology, Intel are on 22nm
AMD have certainly raised the game with the revised version of Bulldozer, known now as Piledriver. However, we have not seen the quoted 'up to 23%' improvement which AMD said there should be. Obviously, that is in an ideal world it may be that big of ...
Abstract: The first generation processors based on AMD's Bulldozer architecture did not meet expectations, so AMD is making a second attempt today, with FX 2.0 or Vishera. The Piledriver cores are a refinement and further development of Bulldozer, that are suppos...
Abstract: It is just over a year since AMD launched its flagship consumer CPU. Probably known to you as 'Bulldozer' and brought to market under the performance-intimating FX branding, AMD's grounds-up design, comprised of up to eight cores, generally failed to win ...
Abstract: Last year, AMD launched its Bulldozer architecture to disappointed enthusiasts who were hoping to see the company rise to its former glory. Today, we get an FX processor based on the Piledriver update. Does it give power users something to celebrate? A...
This year has primarily been about Intel with their success of Ivy Bridge and the Z77 platform, but we mustn't forget about AMD as they still take a chunk of the market that appeals to the budget conscious who want the very best performance, but can't aff...
Just over a year on from the original FX launch where does the FX-8350 leave us? Well looking at the build quality first we have a chip which shares the same good level of manufacturing as previous CPUs. These are resilient chips and cope well with plenty...
