uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.co.uk have collected 266 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
Award: Most Awarded July 2015
July 2015
 
(79%)
266 Reviews
Users
(93%)
2719 Reviews
79 0 100 266

The editors liked

  • Definite clock for clock improvement over Bulldozer
  • Increased clock speeds whilst keeping the same TDP
  • Competes against the Intel Core i5 3570K in lots of tasks
  • Good performance for the money
  • Good stable overclock
  • Great multi
  • Treaded performance
  • Good value for money

The editors didn't like

  • High power consumption is still an issue
  • Single threaded performance still needs improvement
  • 32nm technology
  • Intel are on 22nm
  • Single
  • Threaded performance not great

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 27
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-03-14, Author: Paul , review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • As we noted in the AMD Ryzen 7 1800X CPU Review, gaming is a mixed bag for AMD. Some titles respond well to the new architecture, while most others still require optimization of some sort. Where those optimizations will focus remains a question mark...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-12-01, Author: admin , review by: homemediaportal.com

  • Our AMD FX 8350 review showed that this is a great CPU for any desktop PC build. What stands out is the level of performance you get for the money. Being the first desktop CPU to offer 8 physical cores the level of multitasking that comes with this proces...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-07-14, review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  That the fastest processors are currently made by Intel is not really a secret, but what is the best choice when you want to spend up to £ 50, £100 or £150? To answer that question we conducted a megatest of 57 current AMD and Intel CPUs. From two to...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-02-23, Author: admin , review by: digitalmediaandit.com

  • Abstract:  Currently working with computers, I've studied IT for 1 Year, did IT back in my Highschool days, and been using computers since the day i can remember. Over a decade and a half experience with Computer hardware and software, out of my friends and family i...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2014-08-30, Author: Stuart , review by: hardwareheaven.com

  • Abstract:  Today Intel launched their new X99 chipset and Haswell-E CPUs. We took a look at those over here and to accompany that article we now look in a little more detail at the memory they support in our DDR4 Review. Our DDR4 samples for this round-up come from ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-07-05, Author: Brendan , review by: play3r.net

  • Abstract:  Website: http://www.amd.com/us/products/desktop/processors/amdfx/Pages/amdfx.aspxRRP FX-4350: £95 (At time of the review)RRP FX-6350: £105 (At time of the review)RRP FX-8350: £155 (At time of the review)I am going to be taking a look at AMDs latest “Piled...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2013-07-04, Author: Koen , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  Late May we published a huge round-up of 45 desktop processors , followed by a review of Intel's fourth generation Core processors . Our readers immediately, and understandably, came with the request for a similar group test of laptop processors. It's a...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-05-28, review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  On June 4 Intel is launching its next generation Core processors, also called Haswell. That means it's the perfect opportunity for us to retest all current processors and a number of older ones with a completely new test configuration. It will not only ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-04-08, Author: James , review by: micromart.co.uk

  • Abstract:  AMD's Piledriver line (which succeeds Bulldozer) has been attempting to pull back ground from Intel since its release, primarily through aggressive discounts. One of the few AMD chips that can even start to compete on performance grounds is this, the eigh...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2013-01-24, review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Abstract:  AMD and Intel continue serving up increasingly faster CPUs. But graphics card performance is accelerating even faster. Is there still such a thing as processor-bound gaming? We take two Radeon HD 7970s, high-end desktop CPUs, and a few games to find ou...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 27 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 27   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×