Testseek.co.uk have collected 266 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
July 2015
(79%)
266 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(93%)
2719 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
790100266
The editors liked
Definite clock for clock improvement over Bulldozer
Increased clock speeds whilst keeping the same TDP
Competes against the Intel Core i5 3570K in lots of tasks
Good performance for the money
Good stable overclock
Great multi
Treaded performance
Good value for money
The editors didn't like
High power consumption is still an issue
Single threaded performance still needs improvement
Published: 2013-02-11, Author: Don , review by: tomshardware.com
Abstract: Now that Piledriver-based CPUs and APUs are widely available (and the FX-8350 is selling for less than $200), it's a great time to compare value-oriented chips in our favorite titles. We're also breaking out a test that conveys the latency between frames....
Our hero should have been released a year ago, named "FX-8150." Like any worthy debut processor of a new microarchitecture, it outperforms Phenom II X6 1100T and scores on a par with (sometimes even better than) the top Core i5 CPUs of the 2nd generat...
The AMD LCS that they are offering with the older FX-8150, and supposedly will be offering with the newer FX-8350, is a really nice little unit which will improve overclocking and thermal performance as compared to even a high end forced air unit.I was ab...
Abstract: AMD FX-8350 - Transistor polishing We have to admit that the first encounter with Bulldozer was a bit disappointing, whether we’re talking about our own or the general impression. Simply enough, AMD’s octa-core CPU was expected to deliver a lot, yet it...
Abstract: The launch of Socket AM3+ processors with Piledriver microarchitecture inspired many AMD fans. However, until recently we only based our opinion on the results obtained from the top model in the new AMD FX family. Today we are going to make up for this omission and carry out a detailed performance analysis of all Vishera processors with eight, six and four cores....
Was this review helpful?
-
Published: 2012-11-30, Author: Joel , review by: pcmag.com
Improved performance and power consumption over previous generation products.
Still lags Intel in important areas like gaming
The AMD FX-8350 CPU improves company's standing against Intel but doesn't rewrite the rules of the game....
So, what have we learned? Objectively, when looking at our entire benchmarking and gaming suite, the FX-8350 is priced right where it should be. Let's start with a reminder of price. As configured, the two systems here are $220 apart, or 16.7%. As menti...
Does, the AMD FX-8350, flagship of the new AMD FX range, mark AMD’s return to form? There has been much progress since the launch of the FX-8150, though it has to be said that this isn’t saying all that much. In terms of performance first of all, there...
Abstract: We take a look at the Trinity based A10-5800K and Vishera FX-8350 processors from AMD and see how they do in terms of all important performance....
The FX-8350 is faster across the board than the FX-8150 but like its predecessor, it's hampered by uninspiring single-threaded performance and crummy energy efficiency. In both regards, there's a lot of ground to make up if AMD want to catch Intel. Sa...
