Testseek.co.uk have collected 266 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
July 2015
(79%)
266 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(93%)
2719 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
790100266
The editors liked
Definite clock for clock improvement over Bulldozer
Increased clock speeds whilst keeping the same TDP
Competes against the Intel Core i5 3570K in lots of tasks
Good performance for the money
Good stable overclock
Great multi
Treaded performance
Good value for money
The editors didn't like
High power consumption is still an issue
Single threaded performance still needs improvement
While AMD is trying to make a value statement with its new FX-8350 (selling for $219 at time of publication), it simply will not be able to do so in the enthusiast arena. Perhaps, if we find that the $169 FX-8320 turns out to be a healthy overclocker, it...
Was this review helpful?
-
Published: 2012-10-22, Author: Dan , review by: legitreviews.com
The AMD FX-8350 has a number of strong points that make it a great choice for your computer. If you're looking to upgrade from an older system you really can't beat the price to performance ratio offered with an eight core 4GHz processor processor fo...
Back then, a year ago, when we first met the desktop Zambezi processors, it already felt like AMD Bulldozer didn’t really end up in a good spot. We can’t say that AMD’s microarchitecture is flawed. On the contrary, it is very interesting and is capabl...
Was this review helpful?
-
Published: 2012-10-22, Author: Chris , review by: tomshardware.com
We ran her through the twisties. We did the drag racing. We measured her mileage. We even popped her hood to figure out what makes this little speedster tick. In every way, today's FX-8350 is better than the FX-8150 that preceded it. Faster. More efficien...
Excellent affordability versus computing power, Low platform price, NEW Piledriver CPU core design, Improved "Per Clock" performance, Compatible with existing AM3+ products
Same maximum TDP as previous products, Perhaps a bit late to the market. It still uses 32nm while Intel is on 22nm, Higher power consumption than Intel products, "Low" but adequate single-threaded performance will not appeal to some
What can I say? AMD has priced these new FX-8350 CPUs in such a way that there is no doubt: they make an attractive alternative to their Intel counterparts, and AMD seems focused on keeping that price difference no matter what. AMD can't take Intel ove...
AMD FX 8350 may not be the most powerful option on the market, or have the latest technology, but the raw performance is still ample for most gaming needs...
AMD’s new FX-8350 processor may not be a revolutionary product but it represents the next logical step towards evolving a platform that will be around for the foreseeable future. After the lackluster showings of Bulldozer, Llano and to a lesser extent ...
Increased per thread performance, Higher base frequency at same TDP, Higher overclocking, Eight cores, More performance/lower price, Increased multi threaded performance...
Single threaded performance still not on par with competition...
When Bulldozer was released a year ago, it had a problem that was almost bigger than the single threaded performance and that was broken expectations. After five or so years of delays and hearing about the forthcoming new architecture from AMD, review...
Abstract: Based on the Piledriver architecture, AMD FX-8350 is a mid-range octacore desktop processor. With a base clock speed of 4 GHz and max turbo speed of 4.2 GHz, it is an optimal choice for upgrading from old chips as well as building a new PC from scratch...
