uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Phones » Mobile phones » Samsung GT-S5830 Galaxy Ace



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samsung GT-S5830 Galaxy Ace

Testseek.co.uk have collected 158 expert reviews of the Samsung GT-S5830 Galaxy Ace and the average rating is 71%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung GT-S5830 Galaxy Ace.
 
(71%)
158 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
71 0 100 158

The editors liked

  • 5MP camera with LED flash
  • Geo-tagging and face and smile detection
  • Swype keyboard comes pre-installed for better predictive text
  • Solid feature set for the price
  • Good looks
  • Excellent price
  • Good features
  • Solid smartphone features
  • Compatible with Google Navigation
  • Decent 5MP camera
  • Easy to set up webmail
  • Light and feels good in the hand
  • Good battery life
  • Great looking design
  • Generous screen size
  • External speaker performance
  • Cheap
  • Small and stylish
  • Plenty of Android features
  • Long battery life
  • Usability and handling
  • Clear
  • Intuitive interface
  • Reasonable finish
  • Even if it is all plastic
  • Generally responsive
  • Battery life
  • Surprisingly fast interface
  • Stylish design
  • Easy to type on
  • Fast and responsive UI
  • Graphics quality is relatively good
  • Compact and great build quality
  • Attractive design
  • 3.5inch display challenges devices such as the iPhone 4 / 4S
  • Great battery life

The editors didn't like

  • Only 158MB of internal storage - you will need to buy a separate microSD card to add to the phone. The 800MHz processor
  • Although reliable
  • Falls far behind the processing speed more recent phones are capable of. Startup is slow
  • And the resolution on the
  • Processor can’t compete with many other smartphones
  • No Flash
  • Short on internal memory.
  • Slow internet
  • Laggy and jerky response when swiping
  • Social media lacking
  • Low quality screen
  • Pre-loaded applications that cannot be uninstalled
  • Limited multimedia performance
  • Low resolution video capture is behind the times
  • No Flash player
  • IPhone-like appearance will put some people off
  • No over-the-air Android updates
  • Poor quality video recorder
  • Screen doesn't have much contrast and narrow viewing angles
  • Get rid of the handsfree kit
  • Not much support for music and video formats
  • Low resolution screen
  • No flash support in browser
  • Only runs Android 2.2

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 2 of 16
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-05-12, review by: digitalversus.com

  • Usability and handling, Clear, intuitive interface, Reasonable finish, even if it is all plastic, Generally responsive, Battery life
  • Poor quality video recorder, Screen doesn't have much contrast and narrow viewing angles, Get rid of the handsfree kit, Not much support for music and video formats
  • The Galaxy Ace is a nice little smartphone for anybody who wants to give Android a go without breaking the bank. Apart from the camera, which did better than we'd expected, it's rather limited in multimedia features. But overall, this is a fast, handy ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-05-06, review by: recombu.com

  • The Galaxy Ace is a great mid-range smartphone, and is one of the best-looking mid-priced smartphones we’ve seen. It has all the features you’d expect from an Android phone, although it lacks the very latest version, Android Gingerbread, and the faster...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-05-06, review by: fonehome.co.uk

  • While the HTC Wildfire S is the more attractive mid-range phone, the Galaxy Ace does at least offer a superior screen and slightly speedier performance – factors every bit as crucial as an aluminium unibody chassis....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-04-21, review by: 3g.co.uk

  • Good looks, excellent price, good features
  • Processor can’t compete with many other smartphones
  • Pros: Good looks, excellent price, good featuresCons: Processor can't compete with many other smartphones Verdict: The Galaxy Ace offers good looks and a decent price, but build quality is only average and the screen is a bit disappointing. Nor can the...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-04-15, review by: CNET.co.uk

  • Cheap; small and stylish; plenty of Android features; long battery life
  • No Flash player; iPhone-like appearance will put some people off; no over-the-air Android updates
  • Samsung's made the right sacrifices to keep the cost of the Galaxy Ace down. It has a relatively low-res screen and lacks the power to play Flash video, but this Android phone is packed with fun features and looks much more expensive than it is....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-04-06, review by: tracyandmatt.co.uk

  • The Galaxy Ace could have easily been lost in the ever rising sea of Android smartphones. Even if it isn't a benchmark blazing superphone, it does have a lot going for it. The interface is snappy, and the phone itself is nice to hold. It may be made of...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-03-25, review by: coolsmartphone.com

  • I like this handset. Sure, the Samsung Galaxy S II is more powerful but this is a very good handset which I struggled to find fault with. We tried it out on Three and, with the generous data packages, were comfortable browsing and downloading email on the...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-03-09, Author: What , review by: whatmobile.net

  • Abstract:  Samsung is adding models to its Galaxy family thick and fast, and here€s one that looks like a cut-down Galaxy S.The Samsung Galaxy Ace is one of four siblings in the mid-range Galaxy family launched at the start of the year. It packs lots in for an affor...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-03-09, review by: techradar.com

  • Compatible with Google Navigation, Decent 5MP camera, Easy to set up webmail, Light and feels good in the hand, Good battery life
  • Slow internet, Laggy and jerky response when swiping, Social media lacking, Low quality screen, Pre-loaded applications that cannot be uninstalled
  • A well-priced and featured phone let down by its low-quality screen and slow processor...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2011-02-20, review by: letsgomobile.org/en

  • Abstract:  S amsung Mobile is aiming - with full force - on smartphone market share and act so not without success. Especially the new line-up of Samsung Galaxy smartphones receive a lot of attention. Not so long ago Samsung Mobile introduced the Galaxy Ace smart...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 2 of 16 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 16   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×