uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Phones » Mobile phones » Samsung GT-S5830 Galaxy Ace



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samsung GT-S5830 Galaxy Ace

Testseek.co.uk have collected 158 expert reviews of the Samsung GT-S5830 Galaxy Ace and the average rating is 71%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung GT-S5830 Galaxy Ace.
 
(71%)
158 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
71 0 100 158

The editors liked

  • 5MP camera with LED flash
  • Geo-tagging and face and smile detection
  • Swype keyboard comes pre-installed for better predictive text
  • Solid feature set for the price
  • Good looks
  • Excellent price
  • Good features
  • Solid smartphone features
  • Compatible with Google Navigation
  • Decent 5MP camera
  • Easy to set up webmail
  • Light and feels good in the hand
  • Good battery life
  • Great looking design
  • Generous screen size
  • External speaker performance
  • Cheap
  • Small and stylish
  • Plenty of Android features
  • Long battery life
  • Usability and handling
  • Clear
  • Intuitive interface
  • Reasonable finish
  • Even if it is all plastic
  • Generally responsive
  • Battery life
  • Surprisingly fast interface
  • Stylish design
  • Easy to type on
  • Fast and responsive UI
  • Graphics quality is relatively good
  • Compact and great build quality
  • Attractive design
  • 3.5inch display challenges devices such as the iPhone 4 / 4S
  • Great battery life

The editors didn't like

  • Only 158MB of internal storage - you will need to buy a separate microSD card to add to the phone. The 800MHz processor
  • Although reliable
  • Falls far behind the processing speed more recent phones are capable of. Startup is slow
  • And the resolution on the
  • Processor can’t compete with many other smartphones
  • No Flash
  • Short on internal memory.
  • Slow internet
  • Laggy and jerky response when swiping
  • Social media lacking
  • Low quality screen
  • Pre-loaded applications that cannot be uninstalled
  • Limited multimedia performance
  • Low resolution video capture is behind the times
  • No Flash player
  • IPhone-like appearance will put some people off
  • No over-the-air Android updates
  • Poor quality video recorder
  • Screen doesn't have much contrast and narrow viewing angles
  • Get rid of the handsfree kit
  • Not much support for music and video formats
  • Low resolution screen
  • No flash support in browser
  • Only runs Android 2.2

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 5 of 16
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-05-03, Author: Ashish , review by: firstpost.com

  • The Galaxy Ace is priced very attractively at Rs. 15,500 (Best Price, MOP). Dissecting the handset’s features, there are a few issues like no support for XviD or DivX video codecs, average image quality and a display screen with a slightly low resoluti...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2011-05-03, review by: digit.in

  • Interface is snappy, Good quality of external plastics used, Looks more expensive than it is, Touch screen is accurate, Good battery life
  • Disappointing display quality, Touchwiz 3.0 is dull and drab with nothing unique to offer, UI is same as less expensive cousins, Display lacks an auto-brightness mode, No dedicated camera key

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-03-17, review by: knowyourmobile.in

  • Abstract:  Samsung's latest budget device, Galaxy Ace captures the imagination of the budget smartphone users and iPhone craver's. Packing in all the essentials at a price that is hard to find, the Korean giant has once again proved why it is touted as the world's l...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-02-23, review by: gsmarena.com

  • The Samsung Galaxy Ace has good features for its price: a decent 3.5” HVGA screen, 800MHz processor, pleasing 5 megapixel camera, good build and, of course, Android 2.2 Froyo. However it fails unexpectedly where inferior phones have been known to deliver...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-02-11, review by: knowyourmobile.in

  • Abstract:  Price TBCFrequency TBCPhone Style TouchscreenOS Android 2.2Thickness 11.5mmLength 112.4mmWidth 59.9mmWeight TBCBuilt-in Memory 150MBAdditional Memory MicroSD up to 32GBHigh-speed Data HSDPAConnectivity Wi-Fi, BluetoothScreen Size 3.5-inch, 320x480 pixelsS...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-10-01, review by: technave.com

  • While the HTC Wildfire S is the more attractive mid-range phone, the Galaxy Ace does at least offer a superior screen and slightly speedier performance – factors every bit as crucial as an aluminium unibody chassis.Tags: Samsung Galaxy Ace, Samsung Galaxy...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-04-10, Author: Vernon , review by: vernonchan.com

  • Abstract:  Once in a while, the mobile tech world springs a surprise. The spanking new Samsung Galaxy Ace is one of them. Powered by Qualcomm's 800MHz (MSM7227-1 Turbo) processor, running Android v2.2 Froyo and packed with impressive features like 5MP camera with AF...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-03-17, review by: Mobile88.com

  • Affordable; runs on Android 2.2 Froyo; compact and light; TouchWiz 3.0 interface; camera is decent for still photos,
  • Slow processor; limited onboard storage; QVGA quality video recording; lowresolution screen.
  • The Samsung Galaxy Ace is a very much a scaled-down version of Samsung's higher-end Galaxy phones. Its target definitely isn't the high-end user who is looking to upgrade their Android phone but rather those who are contemplating buying their first An...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-03-15, review by: thestar.com.my

  • Affordable; runs on Android 2.2 Froyo; compact and light; TouchWiz 3.0 interface; camera is decent for still photos.
  • Slow processor; limited onboard storage; QVGA quality video recording; lowresolution screen.
  • The Samsung Galaxy Ace is a very much a scaled-down version of Samsung's higher-end Galaxy phones. Its target definitely isn't the high-end user who is looking to upgrade their Android phone but rather those who are contemplating buying their first An...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2013-10-01, review by: technave.sg

  • While the HTC Wildfire S is the more attractive mid-range phone, the Galaxy Ace does at least offer a superior screen and slightly speedier performance – factors every bit as crucial as an aluminium unibody chassis....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 5 of 16 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 16   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×