uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Phones » Mobile phones » Samsung GT-S5830 Galaxy Ace



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samsung GT-S5830 Galaxy Ace

Testseek.co.uk have collected 158 expert reviews of the Samsung GT-S5830 Galaxy Ace and the average rating is 71%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung GT-S5830 Galaxy Ace.
 
(71%)
158 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
71 0 100 158

The editors liked

  • 5MP camera with LED flash
  • Geo-tagging and face and smile detection
  • Swype keyboard comes pre-installed for better predictive text
  • Solid feature set for the price
  • Good looks
  • Excellent price
  • Good features
  • Solid smartphone features
  • Compatible with Google Navigation
  • Decent 5MP camera
  • Easy to set up webmail
  • Light and feels good in the hand
  • Good battery life
  • Great looking design
  • Generous screen size
  • External speaker performance
  • Cheap
  • Small and stylish
  • Plenty of Android features
  • Long battery life
  • Usability and handling
  • Clear
  • Intuitive interface
  • Reasonable finish
  • Even if it is all plastic
  • Generally responsive
  • Battery life
  • Surprisingly fast interface
  • Stylish design
  • Easy to type on
  • Fast and responsive UI
  • Graphics quality is relatively good
  • Compact and great build quality
  • Attractive design
  • 3.5inch display challenges devices such as the iPhone 4 / 4S
  • Great battery life

The editors didn't like

  • Only 158MB of internal storage - you will need to buy a separate microSD card to add to the phone. The 800MHz processor
  • Although reliable
  • Falls far behind the processing speed more recent phones are capable of. Startup is slow
  • And the resolution on the
  • Processor can’t compete with many other smartphones
  • No Flash
  • Short on internal memory.
  • Slow internet
  • Laggy and jerky response when swiping
  • Social media lacking
  • Low quality screen
  • Pre-loaded applications that cannot be uninstalled
  • Limited multimedia performance
  • Low resolution video capture is behind the times
  • No Flash player
  • IPhone-like appearance will put some people off
  • No over-the-air Android updates
  • Poor quality video recorder
  • Screen doesn't have much contrast and narrow viewing angles
  • Get rid of the handsfree kit
  • Not much support for music and video formats
  • Low resolution screen
  • No flash support in browser
  • Only runs Android 2.2

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 4 of 16
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-02-01, review by: mobilementalism.com

  • The Samsung Galaxy Ace is a great little Android phone that’s perfectly priced. It offers a terrific set of features for the money, looks great, and it’ll fit perfectly in your pocket. If you want the full Andriod experience with a phone that has feat...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-01-27, review by: mobile-review.com US

  • The ringtones volume is ideal courtesy of a dedicated loudspeaker at the back and nice choice of melodies. The vibro is good and has above average power. This is a typical Samsung without any speech communication problems. The Ace is priced at €320, w...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-01-04, Author: Luke , review by: techradar.com/au/

  • Compatible with Google Navigation, Easy to set up webmail, Light and feels good in the hand
  • Slow internet, Laggy and jerky response when swiping, Social media lacking, Low quality screen
  • We're going to re-write the verdict to this phone - it's now under £90 in the shops, is being touted as THE budget phone to buy and bundled with a lot of tablets, so it's only right that users get the proper decision on a phone that launched in January 20...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(40%)
 
  Published: 2011-06-16, review by: goodgearguide.com.au

  • Comfortable design and build quality, Slick user experience, Swype keyboard
  • Comparatively expensive, No Flash capability, Low resolution screen
  • The Samsung Galaxy Ace offers a slick user experience and a comfortable design. However, it is comparatively overpriced compared to some of its rivals. We definitely recommend shopping around before choosing the Galaxy Ace as your next phone...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2011-05-30, review by: cnet.com.au

  • Good look and feel. Smooth user experience. Swype keyboard
  • Low-resolution display. Incompatible with Adobe Flash. Poor video-file recognition. Comparatively expensive
  • The Ace looks and feels good, and executes the basics with ease, but we expect a lot more from a phone at this price point. ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(65%)
 
  Published: 2011-12-01, review by: techsmart.co.za

  • Feels more premium than the Gio due to the larger size and display real estate, good snapper that has a flash, Android Gingerbread powered, hot-swoppable memory card slot
  • Processor matches Gio's speed but scores lower on benchmark test, no HD-ready video recording, display is a fingerprint magnet and prone to showing reflections when used in direct sunlight

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-06-11, Author: Techmagnifier , review by: techmagnifier.com

  • Sensors like accelerometer, gyro, proximity and compass are available on these phones, Music can be enjoyed via MP4/H.264/H.263 player as well as MP3/WAV/eAACplayer with these phones, Organizer, document editor and image editor are also loaded on these Ga
  • There is no shutter key for the camera, Lack of support for Adobe Flash in the web browser, Ambient light sensor is absent on these phones, No DivX/Xvid video support out of the box, Battery does not work sometimes properly as well as the camera zoom
  • Samsung Galaxy Ace S5830 Review gives an impression that this phone from Samsung is not a bad buy at all. This phone is capable of catering to the requirements of the user in the best possible manner. Samsung Galaxy Ace S5830 Price in India is placed at I...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2012-01-24, Author: 21stcenturion , review by: erodov.com

  • Great Design and Display! Android! Good Battery Life!
  • fps Video Recording Just MB RAM No official GingerBread Update Announced! Decent But Not So Loud Volume

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-07-07, review by: pcworld.in

  • Comfortable design and build quality, Slick user experience, Swype keyboard
  • Nothing Exceptional About Features, No Flash Support, Low Resolution Screen
  • The Samsung Galaxy Ace is a mid-range Android 2.2 (Froyo) smartphone with a 3.5-inch display and a 5MP camera. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(72%)
 
  Published: 2011-06-27, review by: techtree.com

  • Multitasking; 5 megapixel camera; 3.5" screen, 800 MHz CPU
  • Uninspiring design; No Flash support; Lacklustre media performance

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
    page 4 of 16 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 16   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×