Testseek.co.uk have collected 51 expert reviews of the Samsung GT-S6810 Galaxy Fame and the average rating is 62%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung GT-S6810 Galaxy Fame.
(62%)
51 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(78%)
67 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
62010051
The editors liked
Small dimensions
Cheaper price
NFC support
Camera takes good outdoor shots
Compact form factor
Attractive design
Decent camera
Affordable price
Decent outdoor shots from snapper
Compact design
Support for NFC.
The Samsung Galaxy Fame’s build won’t blow you away
It’s a stubbier version of the same plastic pebble-shaped design the South Korean pioneered - or arguably underwhelmed us with - with the Samsung Galaxy S3. But modestly sized screens (think less than four inches) like this don’t come along that often these days
And if you know you prefer something petite
It’s something to seriously consider.
Pleasing 5-megapixel camera
Solid construction
Android 4.1 with Samsung TouchWiz UI
Good range of Android features
Good camera for the price
Android 4.1 is fast and featurepacked
Low price
Screen is just the right size for many
The editors didn't like
Difficult texting
Low
Res screen
Low battery life
Stilted performance
Lowres display with poor viewing angles
Keyboard issues
Poor performance
Unimpressive screen
Meagre 2GB of usable storage
Laggy performance
Lowres small screen
Keyboard gripes.
While the performance and software of the Samsung Galaxy Fame are every bit as good
If not superior to all of Huawei and ZTE’s efforts at the same price point
The screen is a little bit wanting. At a mere 320x480
It’s low resolution even for such a small screen
Just to give you some idea
This is the same resolution that the very first Android phone
There's nothing wrong with a cheap, functional smartphone, and the Galaxy Fame is exactly that. The trouble is that even at this price the Fame is being squeezed out by much better phones that cost roughly the same amount. Windows-toting Lumia 520 is a mu...
Abstract: Samsung obviously gets a lot of press regarding its flagship smartphones but the company has long provided consumers with cheaper alternatives that still have some nice features and reasonable specs. Today we are looking at the Samsung Galaxy Fame in a ha...
Was this review helpful?
-
Published: 2013-06-21, Author: What , review by: whatmobile.net
Android 4.1 is fast and featurepacked, Low price, Screen is just the right size for many
Screen is low resolution, Larger, faster phones to be had for less, Thick, stubby design
Was this review helpful?
(70%)
Published: 2013-06-17, Author: Dave , review by: wired.co.uk
Good range of Android features, good camera for the price
Performance not great
The Samsung Galaxy Fame comes out just ahead of its nearest rival the Galaxy Young because of its superior camera. But while its processor appeared better on paper, in practise the lack of RAM held it back and the larger screen actually has a slightly l...
Decent outdoor shots from snapper; Compact design; support for NFC.
Laggy performance; Lowres small screen; Keyboard gripes.
Pros: Decent outdoor shots from snapper; Compact design; support for NFC.Cons: Laggy performance; Low-res small screen; Keyboard gripes.Verdict: Samsung's Galaxy Fame doesn't really offer enough for the price. The small display is low-res, and performa...
Poor performance; Unimpressive screen; Meagre 2GB of usable storage
The Samsung Galaxy Fame is attractive, cheap and has a decent camera. It's let down though by its sluggish processor and lacklustre screen. Unless you're desperate to put a Samsung Galaxy phone in your pocket, you can spend your money more wisely elsew...
The Samsung Galaxy Fame’s build won’t blow you away: it’s a stubbier version of the same plastic pebble-shaped design the South Korean pioneered - or arguably underwhelmed us with - with the Samsung Galaxy S3. But modestly sized screens (think less than four inches) like this don’t come along that often these days, and if you know you prefer something petite, it’s something to seriously consider.
While the performance and software of the Samsung Galaxy Fame are every bit as good, if not superior to all of Huawei and ZTE’s efforts at the same price point, the screen is a little bit wanting. At a mere 320x480, it’s low resolution even for such a small screen: just to give you some idea, this is the same resolution that the very first Android phone, the T-Mobile G1, launched with five years
If you’re fed up with the all the hype about super charged phones with even bigger screens, and you’re sure an iPhone isn’t for you, the Samsung Galaxy Fame might well be the best pick out there. Sure, it’s not as high spec as the Sony Xperia U, but it...
Dire 3.5-inch display, Expensive for specs on offer, Fails to match up with rival devices
The Samsung Galaxy Fame is budget by nature but not by price. It's too slow and laggy and has a dire screen – unacceptable for the £150 price tag. Unless it comes down in price considerably, we advise you look elsewhere....
Difficult texting, Low, res screen, Low battery life
The Samsung Galaxy Fame is not a phone that will live forever, and it hasn't quite learned to fly. It is clear from the very outset that Samsung has used the ingredients to create a lower-end smartphone, such as the smaller internal chipset, the smaller s...
