uk.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Graphic cards » PCI-Express » AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe

Testseek.co.uk have collected 162 expert reviews of the AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe and the average rating is 82%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe.
Award: Good Buy September 2015
September 2015
 
(82%)
162 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
82 0 100 162

The editors liked

  • Best SFF performance
  • True innovation
  • Lots more perf with OC
  • HBM memory
  • Looks the business
  • Great performance
  • Quiet operation at low loads
  • HBM is innovative
  • Extremely low power consumption for performance
  • Compact size is ideal for small form factor
  • High
  • End gaming performance
  • Efficient for a Fiji GPU
  • Teeny weeny
  • Great performance for its size
  • Arguably preferable to the Fury X
  • Tiny design – small enough for mini-ITX
  • Stonking performance at high resolutions
  • High Bandwidth Memory used
  • Brings new levels of performance to the SFF graphics card market
  • Comfortably outperforms other SFF offerings (GTX 970 and R9 380)
  • Capable of playable 4K performance
  • Cooling solution keeps the GPU temperatures in line
  • Cooling solution is not loud enoug

The editors didn't like

  • Clear coil whine on sample
  • No overclocking on memory
  • No HDMI 2.0
  • Crossfire R9 Nano’s defeats the ideal of small form factor suitability
  • Neutral
  • 4GB HBM is good for now
  • But very little future-proofing
  • “The R9 Nano in Crossfire is an amazing achievement for AMD and a great step in the right direction for the future o
  • Super
  • Expensive
  • Size is less of a mini
  • ITX issue now
  • 4GB HBM limit
  • Coil whine
  • Other cards already accomplish its goal
  • Can't handle 4K in every game
  • Ruinously expensive
  • High-pitched capacitor whine
  • A little slower than current flagships
  • Retail price is significantly above its closest performance competitor (the GTX 980)
  • Cooler design exhausts some air directly into the chassis
  • Rear components can get hot and there is no backplate
  • No native HDMI 2.0

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 8 of 17
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2015-09-10, Author: Igor , review by: tomshw.de

  • Eine Grafikkarte, die in Full-HD auf Augenhöhe mit einer werksübertakteten GTX 980 agiert und sie in Ultra-HD mehr oder weniger deutlich hinter sich lässt, gleichzeitig aber deutlich kleiner, leichter und am Ende sogar ein wenig sparsamer ist wünscht sich...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2015-09-10, Author: Florian , review by: gamestar.de

  • 4xAA in 2560x1440 jederzeit ruckelfrei, auch für extreme AA-Modi wie SSAA ausreichend Leistung, selbst für 4K-Auflösung meist ausreichend Leistung
  • 11AMD Radeon R9 Nano - Bilder ansehenFlorian Klein: Im Test birgt die AMD Radeon R9 Nano einige Überraschungen: Der kleine Formfaktor mit nur 15 cm Länge ist einer. Viel erstaunlicher ist aber, ungeachtet der Größe, die Kombination aus High-End-Leistung u...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(94%)
 
  Published: 2015-08-27, Author: Igor , review by: tomshw.de

  • Mit Marketing-Folien und deren Aussagekraft im realen Leben ist es leider immer so eine Sache - egal von wem auch immer sie stammen. Das liegt in der Natur der Dinge und deshalb werden wir im Folgenden die Sicht AMDs mangels eigener, praktischer Erfahrung...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-07-10, Author: Andreas , review by: hardwareluxx.de

  • Leistung auf Niveau einer Radeon R9 Fury / GeForce GTX 980, UltraHD/4K-Aufösungen in den meisten Fällen möglich, Anti Aliasing und Anisotropische Filterung durchgehend möglich, Fiji-GPU mit 4.096 Shadereinheiten, High Bandwidth Memory, Frame Rate Target C
  • 4 GB Grafikspeicher könnten in Zukunft problematisch werden, Spulenfiepen, Hoher Preis, Persönliche Meinung, Die Radeon R9 Nano zeigt am deutlichsten, was mit der Fiji-GPU, der Architektur und vor allem der Kombination aus Fertigung und HBM so alles mögli
  • GPU-Z-Screenshot zur Radeon R9 Nano Der GPU-Z-Screenshot bestätigt die eben gemachten Angaben zur Ausstattung der Radeon R9 Nano noch einmal. <>AMD Radeon R9 Nano im Test Die Fiji-Architektur...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2016-01-11, Author: Michele , review by: pcproffesionale.it

  • Compatta, Memoria Hbm, Prestazioni elevate,
  • Disponibile solo con 4 Gbyte di memoria

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-09-29, Author: Vittorio , review by: nexthardware.com

  • Con la Radeon R9 NANO AMD ha mantenuto le promesse: una scheda ultracompatta adatta a gestire anche il gaming in 4K e con consumi ridotti. Sommando i tre fattori è ovvio che ci troviamo di fronte a un prodotto di nicchia che rappresenta un segmento a par...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2015-09-19, review by: hdblog.it

  • Abstract:  Alla fine degli anni '90 girava in rete l'acronimo W.A.F. - Wife Approval Factor , in breve le possibilità che un certo dispositivo informativo potesse piacere ad un pubblico femminile. L'idea era questa: più un oggetto è piccolo e gradevole da guardare...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-09-10, Author: Igor , review by: tomshw.it

  • Estremamente piccola, Molto leggera, Copertura robusta, Parte del calore disperso esce dallo slot sul retro,
  • HDMI 2.0 assente, coil whining,
  • Potente, piccola e consuma poco. La Radeon R9 Nano fa categoria a sé. Purtroppo non costa poco...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2015-09-10, Author: Paolo , review by: hwupgrade.it

  • E' evidente come Radeon R9 Nano sia un prodotto che AMD propone sul mercato quale unico rappresentante di una categoria molto particolare: quella delle schede di fascia alta che abbinano potenza di calcolo elevata a dimensioni estremamente compatte. Radeo...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-02-15, Author: Robson , review by: lockgamer.com

  • Compacta (ideal para Mini ITX), Novas tecnologias, Baixo consumo, Desempenho de Fury X em OC, Suporta VR, Crossfire XDMA (sem cabos), Memórias HBM
  • – Baixo potencial de OC
  • Para entender a R9 Nano é preciso uma olha de uma perspectiva diferente, afinal ela se distingue das concorrentes em vários sentidos. Aqui o quesito desempenho não é a resposta para tudo pois apesar de ela ser capaz de disputar com placas de respeito da g...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
    page 8 of 17 « Previous   1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 17   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 3€ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×